You are currently browsing the category archive for the 'Grad school' category.
Blech.
I really have no words to describe how it feels to be done with school for potentially forever. I mean REALLY potentially forever. Especially when it’s ALWAYS been over my head – for my entire life – now, it’s just…I’m underemployed. And a well-oiled science-class study machine at this point, which is so out of character that even D is impressed.
Honestly, I have never EVER studied with the intensity that I studied over the last 2 months…EVER.
I’m not really a study-er. Let’s just say it wasn’t necessary. I managed, and it worked out, probably because I write decent papers (some might actually say they are more than decent, but there have been some not-decent ones in there, too, started the night before they are due, written with bursts of clarity and “brilliance” at 4 am, and turned in at 9 am with absolutely. no. editing. what.so.ever….I can admit it, those really were not-so-decent) (although unfortunately, I never suffered, grade-wise, for that behavior, which would be the reason that it never actually stopped) (until the last 2 months, when it finally dawned on me that paper-writing really wasn’t the desired skill in biology or physics) – anyway, all of this to say that I am not used to studying. At all.
(Those previous posts about studying? Which you can find if you look hard enough? Yeah, I mean, I did do that for points in time, but it was always a) late at night, and b) a day late, a dollar short…like in o-chem last summer. So I guess yes, I did study, but not really in the effective way that one really *should* study.) (And I blogged a lot. And took a lot of internet/walk the dog/talk on the phone/look at Facebook/eat some food/stand on my head breaks.)
And, in the last 2 months of my completely convoluted education path, I figured it out. It only took….well, I’m 30, and I’ve been in school for most of the last billion years, so….that’s how long it took.
(I am starting MCAT studying next week.)
(I think those study habits of the last 2 months will probably come in handy for that.)
(Because have I mentioned how much I *suck* at science?!? In hard science, you have a *right* answer and a *wrong* answer. I INEVITABLY pick the WRONG answer. And try very hard, with my lovely skills of Logic and Reason and Writing Prowess – that worked so well in previous courses – to explain why, after 4000 years of Conclusive Evidence-Based Research, that, really, it is This Answer that is ACTUALLY the right one. Scientists have just not really understood anything all these years. That, really, *they* should be grateful to *me* for FINALLY enlightening them.)
(It hasn’t worked. Although in social science, where there are almost *no* Right Answers, or, at least, there are Some Right Answers, and Some Wrong Answers, and really, you could make a good case for any of them, and as long as it’s backed up by Someone’s Research, preferably published in a Peer-Reviewed Journal, it is totally fine.)
(Can we see why, perhaps, there was a taking-hard-science-classes learning curve?)
Going out with a bang, I did take the opportunity to write some love notes on my exam last night, mostly as a way to kind of pull it all (as in, all of these years) together. Sample question:
A woman owns some sheep, and she loves them very much until they are 2 years old, when she ships them off to become food. However, sometimes the neighbor’s mangy dogs come and eat the little lambs. They never eat the big sheep, though. Which survivorship curve best describes this population of sheep?
Now, the whole question of survivorship curves really depends on whether there is a sizeable population of sheep that can make to adulthood – ie, live a long, (prosperous?) life, and then croak.
But I sat there in the damn exam, wondering, “How old are sheep when they are technically adults? Does it happen at 2?”
(And then, if you really want to know, I thought, “Well, Little is an adult at 2. But oh, LITTLE! Would we kill you for mutton chops? Oh, that would be so sad. I would not consider Little to be an adult, but I am pretty sure that is the standard for big dogs…isn’t it? He still acts like a puppy now, and he’s four. He still scampers! But for cats – I think that is a year, to be an adult cat, isn’t it? I wish I’d paid attention to the sheep at the petting zoo. I wonder if that said when they are adults….” and on. I’m sure you get the picture.)
So I wrote a little note. “My answer is D, but if sheep aren’t at maturity at 2, my answer is B.“
There were SEVERAL instances in this exam when I wrote such notes. And, at one point, when discussing adrenal insufficiency – a topic I know a little too well, mostly because I am not the world’s most adherent patient, so I’ve taken it upon myself to be well-versed in what happens if one suddenly *stops* taking prednisone or whatever – which was REALLY not the question, but honestly, this man writes really *confusing* questions, and adrenal insufficiency was a *perfect* answer to his question, although it was not based on anything in any lecture or book – ANYWHOO, I wrote,
“Although I actually know this is correct, if this is not what you are looking for, please give me points for creativity. Thanks!”
Which, you know, is right up there with Logic and Reason.
It’s over.
Phew.
How’s THAT for anti-climactic?
I guess they walked this week, or last week. I got an email saying that I could pick up my diploma now, and I know it wasn’t available until after the ceremony…
I actually did not want to walk, but DB thought after the hell of the last (X) years, I should – apparently we settled that one.
It happened without my knowledge.
(If this was really important to me, I could walk in June, but – surprise – it is not. Important, I mean. It wasn’t important to me before, and it is *really* not important to me now.)
In other news, the dog is pooping regularly (phew), I am still in a lot of pain, but the blood loss has slowed (I’m sure you all wanted to know that), and this morning is my first morning all by myself since last Wednesday, when our little world fell apart.
(In between, DB has stayed home, or my friend has come over in the afternoons – she has a crazy work schedule.) (I am so insanely fortunate.) (And yes, I’ve blown off my job for the last week. Lame job, at home. One of the (few) benefits.)
I am going to try to study for a Bio exam. It is actually interesting – finally! – but the professor seems to have a thing for the effect of pregnancy on various body systems, and you know what? It’s just hard.
We are going to try to go out on a date tonight, if I can make it down the stairs and to our car without gasping for breath. (How dramatic can I be? In fairness, I sound like I have run a marathon after going up the stairs. I assume after my body acclimates to the blood loss, I will no longer sound like a 70-year old with emphysema.) I don’t know where we’ll go. I have to say, I am looking forward to it. A lot.
Or we might end up eating fondue at home. With WINE.
Yup, still looking forward to it.
(P.S. And yes, this is really a *date*. Like, picture high school. Lest you be thinking there is something exciting occurring afterward – oh, no, silly people. Got 5 more weeks to go before that is even a possibility.)
(And now my poor husband is going to crawl under a rock. Let’s not tell him I wrote that.)
(In total honesty, that is the last thing on my mind right now. For the next 15 years.)
(P.P.S. I texted DB the news that, apparently, I graduated. He wrote back, “Oh really? Congratulations! What did you get me? It is customary in graduate school for graduates to buy loved ones a gift.”
So funny, that man!)
So about 30 minutes after I turned in that last paper – no kidding - THIRTY MINUTES – my hard drive totally died (Did that sound like Joe Biden in the VP debate? Ha!). I was editing a nice picture of my pathetic little Christmas tree, and I was going to post it with something that said, YES!!!!!!! I’m DONE!!!!!!!!!!*, and, um, it died. No warning. Just kaput.
So we brought it into the Apple store, and the guy confirmed that yes, indeed, it died.
Thankfully, I had backed up most of my pictures (and documents) a few weeks ago and I don’t delete what is on the card for a while, so I have most of the pictures saved somewhere (in some form), but I did lose a lot of documents. It could be a lot worse. But still…
I have no computer. And nothing says ‘you have a serious addiction’ like losing the object of that addiction cold-turkey.
It turns out that we can get it fixed for free, because we paid for it with AmEx and even though we didn’t buy the extended warranty, it is still covered under the AmEx benefit, which is nice. Yay! But still, am without computer for now. So very very sad.
At any rate, now we are in snowy, snowy, snowy Michigan, where DB’s family is. We attended the funeral of a distant relative who lived to be over 100 (!!) and it was sparsely attended, mostly because of the snow, but also partially because, um, everyone around her had died already. That was very sad, and it made me think a lot about whether it is really desireable to live for a long time.
And NOW we are all snowed out. Holy crap, it snows a lot here. I think they are up to something like 36 or 48 inches or so now, and there is another storm on the way. Yippee!!
So that’s my news: I finished my program (!!), I probably got a new job that sounds AWESOME (!!), and I am spending a lot of time in snowy, snowy, snowy Michigan wishing I had purchased the Uggs (or pseudo-Uggs – something similar) that my mom suggested when we were Christmas shopping the other day.
I will probably not post for a while, because I am on my in-laws super slow computer and it is kind of painful. I will, however, check email and try to respond.
If I don’t get to this before Thursday, Merry Christmas to you all! I will write a longer post when I have a computer later. May we all experience the joys of the reason for this season.
Blessings to all of you!
*Yeah, really, I’m done! After four years of hell with this program, I am outta there with an accidental master’s! PRAISE THE LORD!!!!!!!!!!!
NOT blog. I have total diarrhea of the fingers. Is that what it’s called?
So here are my thoughts, and then on to my paper:
1) I just destroyed a perfectly good zucchini. I tried to make it like they make it at Benihana, which looks insanely easy, but it turns out? Not really. Mine is disgusting and I am still hungry.
2) My house is totally clean. Not spotless, but I spent all day cleaning (rather than writing a paper).
3) And the dog is clean.
3b) And we the Deebster made brownies.
4) And the Bible study that was supposed to happen, which was the reason for the cleaning? Got cancelled.
5) Not by me. Amazingly enough.
6) Although I am thankful nonetheless.
7) Because now I can write the paper.
Because it was gonna be tight: job interview tomorrow (applied yesterday; wow turnaround can make you feel good about yourself) and paper due tomorrow and some inclement weather headed our way at the SAME TIME as the paper is due.
9) But, again, I did not cancel.
10) Which is a Christmas miracle.
11) So is the fact that my house is clean the day BEFORE we leave for Christmas.
12) But alas.
13) Time to write the paper.
14) Comment please. So I can take a paper-writing break.
15) THIS IS MY LAST PAPER OF MY PUBLIC HEALTH EDUCATION!!!!!!!
HALLELUJAH!
Commence commenting/paper writing/brownie-eating…now!
P.S. Oops. Forgot soy sauce. (Actually, didn’t have soy sauce and thought I could get away without it.)
(Answered that one.)
Paper.
If you are my friend on Facebook, you saw my (admittedly stupid) status update: I am starting a paper. I’m going to do this paper EARLY. Seriously.
I was really planning on it, too. Seriously.
But then I started my bio lab.
And I am very sidetracked by my bio lab. We are supposed to do a chi-square analysis of some ant data. For anyone who has spent any amount of time in public health, or with population (ANY population – ants, monkeys, people)-based studies, a chi-square is Not A Big Deal. At ALL. But here is the statement, in the middle of the paper:
“Do all the calculations, refer to [Table] for the critical value, and decide if you will accept or reject the null hypothesis.”
Emphasis mine.
Anyone see a problem with this particular phrasing?!? I DO! So here it is: My major contribution to the collective knowledge of the internet. Here you go. Ready?
YOU CANNOT EVER ACCEPT THE NULL HYPOTHESIS!!!!!!!!
Let me try it again.
You can NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER accept the null hypothesis.
You can reject the null hypothesis. You can fail to reject the null hypothesis. But you canNOT ACCEPT the null.
I can see you thinking: oh, but Rachel. That is totally an issue of semantics.
Actually, my friends, no, no, it is not.
I will try to explain.
The null states that the number of ants infected in population A are the same as the number of infected ants in population B. Get it? The two populations are the same with respect to the number of ants infected IN THIS SAMPLE OF ANTS. (That is an important distinction.)
The alternative hypothesis is this: The number of ants in population A are DIFFERENT from the number of ants in population B. Meaning that there are more, or less, infected ants in one population as compared to another.
Now, if we find there is an important distinction between the ant populations, we will reject the null hypothesis. We will say, “NO! One species of ant is way more infected than the other species.”
However, what if we find they are the same? We will say, “We cannot reject the null hypothesis. We do not have the evidence to suggest that it is any other way than they are the same”. We cannot say “We believe that all ant populations are the same with respect to infection.” We are simply saying, “we cannot conclude with any evidence that the null hypothesis is WRONG.”
Does that make sense?
If it doesn’t, just go with me on this one: You cannot prove a null hypothesis. You cannot accept a null hypothesis. All you can do is REJECT it, or fail to reject it. That’s it.
This is much more important in humans than in ant populations, but it’s statistics and thankfully, statistics is actually the same across disciplines. I know. I’ve gone through a few in the last 10 years.
If you would like more information, you are welcome to contact me.
I am now done with my Stats 101 post. Phew. That feels better now (a little bit. Except I am still annoyed.)
(Argh.)
This just in:
If you abstain from caffeine for four weeks and drink a cup (even a cup of half-caf) of coffee at 9:00 pm, you will not be sleepy at 2:00 am, EVEN IF you thought you were immune to the effects of caffeine.
Who knew?!?
So my days of chaos are over for now. Only one more paper, and I will be done with the school of public health for a very long time – as long as I pass this class (I believe it is impossible not to), I will graduate in a few months with an (unintentional) second master’s degree. Only one more lab report, and I will be done with my undergraduate science classes until the new year (when I have to take finals, and then start the spring semester).
So much has happened in the last few weeks.
I don’t know where to begin.
I would like to write about all of my thoughts and feelings around this time: this master’s degree, although unintentional, is bringing up all sorts of unexpected struggles for me. It is the culmination of almost five years of grief with this program, and although I do have incredible JOY when I think about my alternative – sticking with the doctoral program – I am still dealing with the occasional pang of “what did I do?” and “should I have done this?” I look around at the students in my research class who are eager to be attending THIS school THIS year and I realize that my attitude is poisonous here – it was the wrong decision for me to come back to matriculate full-time in the program last year, and I am unsure of where to go next. There are so many thoughts swirling around in my head about this decision – thoughts I really didn’t anticipate I would have – and because a lot of them are tied to my program and the actual school itself, my subsequent posts will be protected on the subject. I hope you understand. I realize that many of these posts have nothing to do with the chief reason most people read my blog (although frankly, I do not know why ANYone reads this blog – ha! – so perhaps you actually ARE interested in my career paths, although I find that hard to believe), but it helps me to process things by writing about them, and I seem to like the feedback from other people, too.
We have made a lot of decisions in the last few weeks in the baby journey (I can see you start to get more interested now
). Those decisions, coupled with some recent developments in the adoption world, have really occupied a lot of my brain space (which was in high demand, given the whole studying thing that needed to happen this last week). I would like to share my thoughts on that but I am debating the best way to do it. I share a lot of my adoption opinions in the open and I love the feedback; I share a lot of my health and genetics concerns out in the open and I have serious concerns about continuing that, to protect my current family (DB) and anyone who might join us in the future. Although I feel strongly that some of what I write is important to disseminate to the world (even though I do not have a huge readership, the fact that I still get 50 hits/day for the phi symbol shows that I can totally capture some small sliver of an audience!), I am realizing that protecting my family needs to be paramount to anything else. I am not sure how to proceed, although one thing I *do* know is that I will be writing about those things, too.
We are debating starting a second blog that eliminates any mention of the FBI so I can talk about these other things freely: my career, our future children, my health, our plans and our lives, our LOCATION (which is integral to who I am and what I do). I am debating starting a second blog anonymously so that I can write freely about these things without my neighbors and friends and family reading about my personal thoughts, but I love the community from blogging and I seem to be incapable of very much anonymity. (DB once told me to apply for the CIA because I would find it interesting. I think we can see why that would be a poor match for me.) I am debating shutting this blog down entirely and migrating the FBI stuff to a new one and starting fresh with another one. I am debating continuing my current path, where I can post whatever I want and change the password every three months for the posts I want to protect. However, I am conflicted. I love writing, although I am not necessarily very good and I never actually edit what I write here (what you read here is the Very Rough Draft). I love having an audience – is that bad? I love having people read and comment and I love making new friends. But I also want to share freely and not have people feel uncomfortable asking for passwords – that is really not my goal.
I am open to suggestions. I know a lot of you are seasoned bloggers and might have some opinions about this.
Also, all of the above might become completely moot in the morning, when I have had an epiphany about what to do. Just to warn you.
In the meantime, you will see some new protected posts. I am going to start to share some of what is going on in my head and it will be less about mean girls and more about my faith, my pride, my career, and my struggles in finding my role as a wife, a mother, and as a contributor to society (like what on Earth am I doing here?!?). I mean, don’t get me wrong – if something funny happens, I’ll be happy to share it. But I think it will help me figure out where I’m going if I can share the other parts freely, too. As always, reach out if you are interested in continuing to follow this blog. I will try to gather a list of names of those I *know* read the blog and will pass along the password to those people. If you don’t receive an email in the next week or so, please reach out to me.
Blessings to all of you this holiday season.
down in my heart.
Where?
Down in my heart!
We taught English in Cambodia last year and this was one of the songs that our (adult) students adored. They also loved to play musical chair-body-parts, where you stop the music and call out a body part and they have to put the body part on the chair. I have video. It’s awesome. But I can’t post it, cause that would be a breech of…something. I just wouldn’t feel right about it. But those early mornings (class started at, like 5:45 or something….yes, am) were awesome with the body parts musical chairs.
That is so not the point of my post.
Yesterday was the weirdest day. I woke up, and I felt like I’d been run over by a Mack truck (only I bet people HAVE been run over by a Mack truck, and probably the results were worse than what I was feeling, so I feel like perhaps I am diminishing their experience) – and I realized that both the dog AND DB were gone, which was suspect. Imagine my joy at having a husband that would take out the dog, even though I have nowhere to be – just so I can sleep later to feel better? Yes. I love him.
So after sleeping for 12 hours (maybe more, who knows) (yes, I know those of you with kids are envious. I will also say that I am pretty sure if I was that sick with kids, DB would have taken a sick day to watch the kid(s) so I could have slept, too. Really, I am not embarrassed about my 12 hours), I woke up, and I found out that that FBI agent had been killed, and that was really sobering.
And then I went to class.
At the school where I left my doctoral program in public health. (I have to take a class there to finish a master’s degree – it’s a class doctoral students don’t normally take.)
To truly have an understanding of my situation, you would need to read this, this, and this (2nd half of post), and those might not even do it for you. But let’s just say that I really lamented this decision, and many people were not supportive of the decision. I left after 4 years of pain and agony at this program, 1 year of full-time work, and 1 year of cultivating some friendships with the people in my cohort. And at the end of the year, I decided that I absolutely. did. not. want. to. finish.
The rationale behind this is all amply described in that other post (if you’re really interested).
So last night, I’m in this class, which is, incidentally, a Very Agonizing Class for me because I’ve already TAKEN it. At another school. And it’s required for me to get a master’s degree (my accidental masters, just to get SOMETHING out of the doctoral work), and it’s required that I take it AT THIS SCHOOL, which just goes to the heart of why I am a little frustrated with this school, but whatever. So I decide in the middle of the lecture that I Really Need A Snack, and while I was standing at the vending machine (filled with Fake Healthy Snacks – the kind that taste like cardboard and make the public health people feel like we are making ourselves healthier, when in reality they are just grossness) debating what Fake Healthy Snack to buy (I picked some Snackwells cookies – which were gross. Although I used to like them. I am so evolved now on my food opinions…if I’m going to eat crap, I really want to eat Real Crap, not fake stand-in crap. For dinner, I ate Doritos and yogurt. Hey, dude, it’s protein, ok?) OK – so I was standing there, debating, and my old colleagues came up, super excited that I was there.
“RACHEL!!!!! You’re BACK!” – which always is very good for my self-esteem. Because I am not that cool, so when people get excited about me, I think, “hey! They think I’m cool!” – don’t we all think this? Because now I will feel like a total loser.
And here is where I am going to purposely insert an aside. I’ve often wondered in the last few months whether this decision – the decision to abandon my plan to get a doctorate in public health – was a bad one. I mean, in the beginning, yeah, it was all joyous and exciting and I was Walking On Air, but then the reality hit: I have a lame job, and after being expected to think critically in doctoral-level coursework, I am now taking…undergraduate biology and physics, and being expected to regurgitate facts. And oh, did I mention my lame job? Society isn’t exactly awed by what I’m doing right now.
And if I’m honest, I will say that it is ALL about what society thinks that impacts how I see myself, which is just WRONG and I feel incredible guilt about that, but it’s true. I would love to be able to say, “I feel that God spoke to me and said, ‘Rachel, leave your doctoral program now’”, but I’d be lying. I don’t disparage people’s experiences of that – at ALL – but I feel in my situation that God could have used me with a doctorate in public health and God would have celebrated my departure from the program. I don’t think that God really CARED one way or another whether I left my program – what I believe is that He CARED how I used my skills. Which really puts the burden back on me, right – the burden to live for Him? This is the spiritual version of lemonade making from lemons.
So I’ve often wondered, “Was that the right decision? Is that the most God-honoring decision?” – and my posts over the last few months have been about things like careers and motherhood, and depression over my pathetic lack of job, etc.
And then we had last night.
And my friends came up to me.
And I said, “How are things going here?!?” – and they said, “[qualifying*] exam…blah blah blah…oral exam…blah blah blah…oh I am so stressed…things are OKAY….dissertation…”
And I thought, Oh, I am so, so, so, so, so, so, so happy! I don’t need to do those things! I am free of this place! This totally oppressive, humiliating (not humbling – that is different – no, this place was hellacious) place! I AM FREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Joy. Unadulterated joy.
(And I told them that. I don’t think they were nearly so excited as I was to find out that I had achieved some sort of freakish nirvana.)
(Although I did emphasize to them that if we were to switch places, they would not be nearly so happy, because that program is right for them. And it is not right for me.)
(That didn’t really help much.)
It was a totally redeeming experience.
What I am thankful for: The balls to make a humongous decision that was right for me, and that everyone else discouraged. I think everyone should do this at least once in their lifetimes. It is totally liberating.
*AKA comprehensive exam, or comps. Different schools call them different things. My school doesn’t use either of these terms.
**You will need a password for the third post. Let me know if you need it.
I have a confession. Hopefully I will not regret this.
Last spring, one of our assignments for a statistics class was to do this implicit association test. (Go ahead, try it! It is interesting! There is a new poll out for the 2008 Election!) We were analyzing an article on facial features, and the professor wanted us to learn a little bit more about our own implicit associations. I went to the website and took some of the tests, not really knowing what to expect: we plan to adopt children from other countries who do not look like us; I spend a LOT of time researching anti-racist parenting practices, experiences of discrimination and racism, and my own personal beliefs.
I did not realize how much I’d learn about my own implicit associations.
I took several of the tests. As I had expected (and, frankly, hoped) I did not have any huge hangups on race or gender (phew). But I did have one major preference: I strongly preferred Democrats over Republicans.
Like apparently, I cannot stand Republicans. Really. I could be rated as having a “slight”, “moderate”, or “strong” preference for Democrats; I had a “strong” preference. Which is a little disconcerting for me.
I’ve mulled this over at various points in the last several months. I think part of the issue is my sincere belief, as a Christian, that George Bush is a horrible president who cavalierly risked American and Iraqi lives in a gratuitous and unnecessary war, and to say that this upsets me is a gross minimization. The IAT used pictures of Donald Rumsfeld (architect of the war), George Bush (moron who agreed to war, whether he really played a huge role in the plans or not), Dick Cheney (who is the spawn of Satan), and Colin Powell (who I really loved prior to his speech at the UN, and I had some hurt feelings over his role in this war, too). I think the fact that the test used *these* specific individuals probably skewed my personal results dramatically.
And, in fact, it’s funny – I worked for the Republican party in 1995-1996, when Newt Gingrich was the Speaker leading the “Republican Revolution“. I was a House page (yes, like the famed Foley targets), and I certainly, gleefully, excitedly drank that Kool-Aid…I cursed the evil President Clinton and I fervently believed that it was the Republicans that drove home a balanced budget. (In fact, our checkbook is still encased in a “Balance the Budget” plastic thingy that I saved from that era. Oh, oh, oh, how times have changed). But perhaps that is what is driving my recent hatred of conservatives in general: they say they are pro-Iraq war, yet their platform (until recently) rallied against “nation-building”. It is under a Republican president that our deficit reaches unprecedented levels after a period of surplus. And I took the test a while back, so this wasn’t relevant then, but it is now: It was Reagan who first came up with the EITC (the only way to make more money on taxes than you actually pay – aka a redistributive program - aka sharing the wealth), and there is nothing more socialist than $700 billion in taxes invested in private banks.
In short: hypocrisy, anyone?
But at the same time, I am a little uncomfortable with this…this disgust with any group of people. I’m not prejudiced – I have lots of friends who are Republican! However, I find myself getting really, really, really mad at those who support Republicans in this race! And (this is so terrible – really, it is, and I am praying that this part of me goes away) – I find myself challenging the Christianity of those single-issue voters* (*not the ones who are anti-death penalty, pro-social services, and support life from conception to death – those are not included in this list) – whose pro-life views I see as being limited to one’s life between one’s conception and birth – without regard for the lives that struggle in the period of time after birth. If we care so much about life, why don’t we try to take care of the youngest citizens we do have? What does it say about our society when our foster care system is in shambles? That we have millions of kids going to bed hungry every night? That we fail to provide health care for breast-feeding mothers after three months post-partum? Where is the pro-life in that?!? And, what’s more: What would Jesus say about that?
_____
And as an update:
–We are betting on Obama breaking 340 electoral votes. If I win, I get two Grey’s Anatomy viewings with DB WIDE AWAKE and dinner out at a non-chain restaurant. If he wins, he gets to eat at Chilis with margaritas and as many tortilla chips as he wants without me complaining about how he is eating too much.
I know you’re jealous – oh, the exciting life we lead.
–AND…my internet fights. So Crazy Woman wrote back yesterday: at first, she sent out a hodgepodge of thoughtless commentary (peppered with the occasional “Are you INSANE?” and “Are you NUTS?” – yes, definitely directed to me), and it was quite the entertaining (if unnerving) read. Then she sent out an “oops, didn’t mean to send out my rough draft! Stay tuned for the final!” email, to which I quickly shot off a personal reply – “no need to send the final – I think we all got the picture. May God bless you, and thank Him that we live in a country with free speech, huh?”
Then we got the final draft – a slightly more coherent ramble, complete with some personal attacks on me and copious Republican (and, stunningly, Bush defense) propaganda.
I’m now sitting on a few responses. My poor mother (who lives in the neighborhood with these folks – really, I do not know why I received this, since I have never actually lived in this neighborhood…EVER…unless you count Christmas holidays) would have preferred me to never get into this debate, and is hoping that I do not respond at all. However, the level of personal attack was such that I feel like I should say SOMEthing….right?
Today was Recycling Day (as all non-holiday Mondays around here are). Guess what went out with the recycling: the cookie dough tub, and it wasn’t replaced at the grocery store today, either.
(Sigh.)
That’s really all I have to say about that. I have yet to start writing the paper, but I have finally completed the background research. It’s due in the morning.
It’s gonna be a long night. Comments celebrating the newly flipped dietary leaf, or responding to my somewhat incomplete adoption statements below, are always welcome. I realize that’s pathetic to beg for comments, but at the same time, it’s kind of pathetic to eat cookie dough for breakfast, announce that you’ve stopped, or continue to announce the impending beginning of a terrible paper (a paper, in fact, that no one cares about, including the pathetic person herself), so I’m okay with the comment begging.
Cheers!
P.S. Little wanted me to share his annoyance about this paper, too. This is what he does to get my attention (I cut myself out of the picture – if you want the real picture, just ask…)

